<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ZorkiKat ЗоркиКат Фотографий &#187; SLR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zorkikat.com/tag/slr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zorkikat.com</link>
	<description>Cameras. Cats. Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>(Extreme!) Closeups with a Rangefinder Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.zorkikat.com/extreme-closeups-with-a-rangefinder-camera/526/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zorkikat.com/extreme-closeups-with-a-rangefinder-camera/526/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contaflex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contax d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exakta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miranda camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miranda focabell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon f]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax hv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rangefinder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rangefinder Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rangefinder closeups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rangefinder reflex accessory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zorki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorkikat.com/extreme-closeups-with-a-rangefinder-camera/526/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rangefinders, due to design limitations, have limited close up focusing abilities. Most can focus only up to 1 metre or slightly less. The RF mechanism will not permit easy focusing for closer objects. The separate viewfinder won&#8217;t show the correct field- due to parallax. Separate viewfinders also won&#8217;t show the FOV change as the focus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Rangefinders, due to design limitations, have limited close up focusing abilities. Most can focus only up to 1 metre or slightly less. The RF mechanism will not permit easy focusing for closer objects. The separate viewfinder won&#8217;t show the correct field- due to parallax. Separate viewfinders also won&#8217;t show the FOV change as the focus gets closer: Field of View becomes narrower as the lens focuses closer.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Closeup supplementary lenses which attach to the lens are available, but using them is cumbersome. They require the use of separate framing devices and focus is never exact since focusing requires a conversion table where the lens must be set for each closeup focus setting.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The early SLRs&#8217;s touted sales claim was the ability to make close-ups&#8230; that was their only selling point because everything else about them was a pain to use. Just handle an Exakta or Contax D, or a Contaflex and you&#8217;ll see why RF reigned supreme for years before the introduction of the Nikon F or Pentax HV.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Reflex focusing attachments thus became available for this. These devices convert the RF camera into an SLR. The mirror viewfinder is attached to the lens mount. The extra extension allows the lens to focus really close. With extra bellows, the ability to focus really close even becomes greater. Leitz made VISOFLEX. The Soviets decided to fuse the accessory mirror reflex attachment to the camera and created the Zenit.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This one is the not-so-common Mirax Focabell, made by Miranda Camera. Miranda is a now extinct Japanese camera maker. The Focabell was the only(?) accessory they made for the Leica and its copies. Miranda never made Leica copies; they went to making SLRs right away</span><span style="color: #cdcdcd; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 8pt;">.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #cdcdcd; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 8pt;"><a href="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/focabell.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-662" title="focabell" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/focabell.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="400" /></a></p>
<p></span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This attachment fits the Leica easily. It will usually fit some of the FED or the Zorki, but because of their non-standard lens mounts, the mirror reflex housing does not always line up properly on them.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I&#8217;ve only used this attachment once or twice. I don&#8217;t even remember what I took with it&#8230;</span></p>
<h4  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h4><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.zorkikat.com/how-not-to-destroy-your-fed-and-zorki-a-basic-primer/123/" title="HOW NOT TO DESTROY YOUR FED AND ZORKI (A Basic Primer)">HOW NOT TO DESTROY YOUR FED AND ZORKI (A Basic Primer)</a></li><li><a href="http://www.zorkikat.com/a-simple-tool-substitute-for-exakta-repair/665/" title="A Simple Tool Substitute for Exakta Repair">A Simple Tool Substitute for Exakta Repair</a></li><li><a href="http://www.zorkikat.com/my-second-exakta-and-the-replacement-of-its-shutter/581/" title="My Second Exakta and the Replacement of its Shutter.">My Second Exakta and the Replacement of its Shutter.</a></li><li><a href="http://www.zorkikat.com/filter-basics-for-black-and-white-photography/168/" title="Filter Basics for Black and White Photography">Filter Basics for Black and White Photography</a></li><li><a href="http://www.zorkikat.com/what-lens-to-use-for-industar-or-jupiter-lenses/164/" title="What Lens Hood to Use for Industar or Jupiter Lenses?">What Lens Hood to Use for Industar or Jupiter Lenses?</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zorkikat.com/extreme-closeups-with-a-rangefinder-camera/526/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zenit Naman!</title>
		<link>http://www.zorkikat.com/zenit-naman/46/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zorkikat.com/zenit-naman/46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Russian and Ukrainian Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLRs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classic SLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rangefinder Filipinas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zorkikat.com/zenit-naman/46/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first Zenit was really an RF-SLR hybrid made by KMZ.  KMZ made Zorki.  The Zenit was actually the SLR version of the Zorki.  They started by &#8216;fusing&#8217; the reflex housing and prism finder on the existing Zorki-1 body.  The Leica-shaped oblong body was retained.  The Leica-style  shutter was also retained, and a reflex-mirror viewing system [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span style="font-family: verdana;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">The first Zenit was really an RF-SLR hybrid made by <a href="http://www.zenit-foto.ru/index.php?show=text&amp;cat=about&amp;id=2&amp;m=2">KMZ</a>.  KMZ made Zorki.  The Zenit was actually the SLR version of the Zorki.  They started by &#8216;fusing&#8217; the reflex housing and prism finder on the existing Zorki-1 body.  The Leica-shaped oblong body was retained.  The Leica-style  shutter was also retained, and a reflex-mirror viewing system was built around it.    The LTM 39 mount was also used. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;"> </span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><img src="http://pic4.picturetrail.com/VOL740/2933453/20612801/346594241.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: verdana;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">This Zenit (-1) is from 1955.  The logo is in Script Cyrillic- so it reads like &#8220;3eHum&#8221;.  With a not-so-common Zenit M39 Industar-22 lens.  The lens was soon replaced in the later production runs with the more common Industar-50.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">A new set of M39 (&#8220;ZM39&#8243;) lenses were made for the Zenit.  These lenses would not focus properly when used on RF Zorki or Leica; likewise the LTM39 lenses made for Zorki or Leica won&#8217;t focus properly.  When the latter are used on Zenit, they will act like close-focus lenses with a very limited focusing range of about 10-15 cms only.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">The shutter style which first appeared in the Leica I and II was used in the Zenit.  And continued to be used in the succeeding models which used cloth curtain focal plane shutters.  They are still being made now, making these Zenit the only LIVING LINK to the original Leicas.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;"><em>The Zenit-1 and Zenit-S (C) are, IMO, the C_U_T_E_S_T  SLRs ever made!</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">Zenit cameras, when 35mm film SLRs still reigned supreme, were often dismissed as worthless junk.  The pros shunned them, and the famous _______(fill with the SLR brand you know)-snobs refused to acknowledge their presence.   Zenit were seen cheap, unreliable, and incapable of shooting anything approaching &#8216;acceptable&#8217; quality.  And curiously enough, most, if not all, of the Zenit detractors were people who, (1) haven&#8217;t handled a &#8216;live&#8217; Zenit; (2) haven&#8217;t shot with a Zenit and seen what it does; (3) have impressions based on what they heard, read, or assumed.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;"><strong>Here are what they said- obviously based on uninformed opinion</strong>:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">1. It came from the USSR (Zenit were, and are still made in Russia), so it&#8217;s bad and backward.  It is true that Zenit have less &#8216;advanced&#8217; features- features which were found in cameras made a generation or two before in the west.  But most of these features were good and proven, so there wasn&#8217;t (at least in the socialist situation in the USSR then) any need to constantly put in more gimmicks as with products from the sales-competitive capitalist west.  And remember, the USSR was able to send satellites and people to space before anyone in the capitalist hemisphere did.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">2. Only people who can&#8217;t afford &#8216;real&#8217; cameras use it.  Zenit cost about 1/5 to 1/10 of what a Japanese equivalent SLR cost when new.  They still are cheap now, some can be found for $15 on eBay.   The low cost made them more accessible to people who didn&#8217;t have the means to get the known brands.  It was seen used by photographers who shot in churches and parks.  And often with students.   Zenit are real cameras in every respect.  The common Zenit  used a shutter which descended from the original Leica.    How much more &#8216;real&#8217; can a camera be?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">3. The shutter speed range of 1/30 &#8211; 1/500 is very limiting.  True, if one does a lot of slow exposures or action shots.  But when one thinks about it, 96% or more of all exposures taken are made in the 1/30 to 1/500 range&#8230;.when was the last time  1/4 sec was used? And how often was it used? How about 1/2 or 1/10 sec?  Leica and many cameras ran on this &#8220;limited&#8221; speed range alone for years, and many excellent photos were produced despite this &#8216;limiting&#8217; feature.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">4. The lenses are incapable of making &#8216;sharp&#8217; pictures.   Often heard from people who&#8217;ve only heard of Zenit.  The lenses found in Zenit are descendants of Carl Zeiss lenses.  The Russians also improved on these magnificent designs by using new glass and anti-reflection coatings.  The original Carl Zeiss lenses didn&#8217;t even have these.  The various &#8220;Helios-44&#8243; 2/58mm lens versions commonly found with Zenit are really improvements on the Biotar.<br />
Even the cheapest Industar-50 is really a Tessar offspring.  The others may well be Planars or Sonnars (like the Jupiter-9) in disguise.    The Japanese copied Zeiss lenses (as Nikkors or Serenars) when they were just starting out.  The Russians continued making and improving them.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">5. Zenit were unreliable.   There were indeed bad apples.  Poor design and loose quality control aren&#8217;t exclusive to KMZ either. But many were quite excellent.  Some designs like the Zenit 11, 12XP, or the earlier ones are virtually indestructible.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;"> </span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><img src="http://pic4.picturetrail.com/VOL740/2933453/20612801/346594222.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: verdana;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;">Link:  <a href="http://www.zenitcamera.com/index.html">ZENIT KMZ SITE</a><br />
<a href="http://www.zenit-foto.ru/index.php?show=main&amp;cat=main&amp;id=1"><br />
</a></span></div>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana;"><a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://www.zenit-foto.ru/index.php?show=main&amp;cat=main&amp;id=1"><br />
</a></span></p>
<h4  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h4><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.zorkikat.com/extreme-closeups-with-a-rangefinder-camera/526/" title="(Extreme!) Closeups with a Rangefinder Camera">(Extreme!) Closeups with a Rangefinder Camera</a></li><li><a href="http://www.zorkikat.com/how-not-to-destroy-your-fed-and-zorki-a-basic-primer/123/" title="HOW NOT TO DESTROY YOUR FED AND ZORKI (A Basic Primer)">HOW NOT TO DESTROY YOUR FED AND ZORKI (A Basic Primer)</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zorkikat.com/zenit-naman/46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

