
It cost about the same, perhaps even more, than the usual, working similar FED model from a later time. At that cost, those FED even come with a lens. This one doesn’t even have its lens mount. Missing just about every exterior fastening screw, and without its pressure plate and pressure plate springs.
This FED has a 5-digit serial number which puts its production year to 1937. Marked NKVD (НКВД), “Peoples Commissariat for Internal Affairs” the KGB’s predecessor in Stalin’s time. This does not mean that the camera was made for the Secret Police. It only meant that the camera was made by a factory which was managed by the NKVD. “FED” after all stood for F E Dzerzhinskij, the founder of the NKVD.

The shutter crate bottom is bent and distorted. The crate isn’t a single cast part, like in later cameras. In this one, it’s made of several stamped plates joined together. The crate looks to have been hand stamped and assembled.

At least the parts involved in the shutter and range-finding operations seem to be complete. Dirty, but intact. No broken gear teeth. Gear trains still meshed.
And despite its damage, the viewfinder is very bright and contrasty. The rangefinder window is also clear, with a very clear patch showing a snappy moving image. Better than what I’ve seen in better graded old Leicas!. The Soviets must have used a different, more corrosion-resistant reflective coating on their RF beam-splitters.

The shutter blinds, made of highly perishable cloth and rubber are totally gone. The fabric tapes which pulled the blinds to and fro appear to still be doing their work. In fact the long tapes ( looped on brown coloured brass roller on the right) can be seen still tight, reeling in what remains of the long shutter blind. The shutter blinds and tapes (ribbons) can be easily replaced.
The Rangefinder Coupling “sensor” (the silver coloured part at the top part of the shutter crate) is oblong shaped, not the small tear-dropped shape found in later FED-1 cameras. Some references say that cameras of this type should have the tear drop-shaped focus follower. This one still has the oblong version of the first type.

Somewhere on the shutter crate (in the part next to the film cassette) is engraved “II/11/XII” and “5.42″. Both sets of figures appear to correspond to date marks. “5.42″, i.e, May 1942 may refer to a later servicing date since the camera’s serial number dates it from 1937. Russian date notations use a mixture of hindu-arabic and roman numerals: roman for months and hindu-arabic for month and year. The usual order is day-month-year; so 28 October 2009 would be inscribed as “28/X/09″. “II/11/XII does not seem to refer to a proper date. Is “II” the second year of manufacture? 11/XII may refer to December 11. But again, the serial number of this camera, starting with “31″ puts it at an earlier date in 1937 since the number range covered by that year goes to “53xxx”.
Restoration will be done soon. The works can be cleaned, and the shutter blinds replaced and new fastening screws attached. However, this FED won’t be functional until it gets a pressure plate and a lens mount. Something with a standard Leica flange would be great to have, and have this camera calibrated to the correct Leica Standard. This FED originally had a non-standard lens mount and lens working distance. Only the original lens which the factory issued with the camera would properly work. Having neither lens or lens mount means more flexibility in restoring this camera.
8 Responses to My Newest FED-1
Augustus Valentinus Behrens
November 27th, 2009 at 23:14
Wow, you are The Master ! Very insightful post, I am very curious as to what will become of this jewel
Iver Aldas
December 26th, 2009 at 08:02
cant wait for the resurrection of this camera. . .
admin
December 30th, 2009 at 04:53
Repair completed 27.XII. 2009. Wait for the next post.
ed
August 17th, 2010 at 08:11
your really good… I am wondering if you could repair my canonet QL17…. please email me if you can (shutter speed selector is not working, sticky aperture, shutter stucked at bulb mode) before I bring it to hidalgo (i dont know if someone can repair an RF there). 09154879116
Michael
October 23rd, 2010 at 17:26
It’d be nice to see this camera finished. You seem to have abandoned this blog, when I was enjoying it so much.
mahesh
March 10th, 2011 at 17:40
Hogwash! All fake, obviously. What can Philippinos do? They’re not good for anything, much less have the capacities to work on complex machines like this.
MPM
November 13th, 2011 at 22:26
It is an interesting task to fix old FEDs. The original camera design by Oskar Barnack (Leica II of 1932) was so good that all clones have inherited it’s virtues: they are simple, yet refined, they are mostly easily repareable (if you have got spare parts or another body to cannibalize) and they are mostly quite handsome cameras. In case of the FED we must not forget that the boys in the Djerzhinksky Labour Commune did the nearly impossible: they copied the most advanced camera of its time nearly from scratch, without any precision-mechanical tradition and with primitive means, and they did it well! I love old FEDs, so I understand that you do, too. Best greetings to the Phillipines from Vienna, Austria. MPM.
admin
November 13th, 2011 at 23:38
Hello MPM, thanks for the comment. Yes I am a certified FED (and Zorki, and just about any ‘Barnack’ type) addict!
This camera was repaired rather easily. I only had to look for a suitable lens mount. I found one from an old discarded Zorki-S. I don’t really relish the thought of cannibalising another camera, so I just ask for suitable parts from other people who are also into fixing cameras… I am quite impressed at what the early workers of the FED commune did- this camera dates from those early times, and I can say that they really did good for the conditions they had. I have already repaired this camera. I made the replacement shutter material myself. This FED is an excellent and respectable machine- it will compare favourably with the original Leica II and since it does not fall short in any ability, the FED can and will shoot as well as any Leica II.