<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ZorkiKat ЗоркиКат Фотографий &#187; Camera Repair &amp; Restoration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zorkikat.com/category/camera-repair-restoration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zorkikat.com</link>
	<description>Cameras. Cats. Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Kiev Shutter Straps</title>
		<link>http://www.zorkikat.com/kiev-shutter-straps/330/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zorkikat.com/kiev-shutter-straps/330/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Repair & Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiev/contax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian and Ukrainian Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shutter Adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorkikat.com/kiev-shutter-straps/330/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Note: The following is a simplified description of the process for replacing broken Kiev shutter ribbons.  For a more detailed instruction, see Rick Oleson&#8217;s Contax Shutter Repair Page or Russ Pinchbeck&#8217;s Kiev Shutter Repair.)
Kiev, and the Contax cameras they were patterned after, were great cameras.  Overengineered to give a certain amount of precision that you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>(Note: The following is a simplified description of the process for replacing broken Kiev shutter ribbons.  For a more detailed instruction, see Rick Oleson&#8217;s <a href="http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-29.html" target="_blank">Contax Shutter Repair Page</a> or <a href="http://www3.telus.net/public/rpnchbck/cleaning%20and%20repairs.html" target="_blank">Russ Pinchbeck&#8217;s Kiev Shutter Repair</a>.)</em></p>
<p>Kiev, and the Contax cameras they were patterned after, were great cameras.  Overengineered to give a certain amount of precision that you and your mum would love.  But the complex mechanism, so full of parts and movements, made it prone for more opportunities for failure.  For instance, the shutter.  The metal focal plane shutter used in Kiev had some distinct advantages over the Leica style double cloth type.  It will never burn pinholes.  It will likely to keep its timing better too.  But it had a serious weak point- the shutter run on fibre straps.  Brass slats running, pressing, and bearing on silk ribbons would soon wear the latter out, causing it to break.  Breakage is inevitable- wear, age, and even the climate will eventually kill the ribbons.  And often this breakage happens without warning.  The ribbons aren&#8217;t visible, so their state cannot be assessed easily.</p>
<p>It happens quickly too.  One moment the shutter winds and fires ok.  Then suddenly, the winding knob will turn heavier than it did just a few shots ago.  The shutter will fire with a different sound.  The &#8216;click&#8217; no longer sounds complete- the closing sound that completes the cycle seems to be missing.  All indicators of shutter breakage.  And when you take off the camera&#8217;s back, this is what you&#8217;ll see- an empty gaping hole where the shutter once was:</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9504.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>The shutter can be wound. But instead of seeing an opening and closing blind, only one set seems to be moving.  Or none at all if the two ribbons broke.</p>
<p>Taking off the shutter cover/film gate plate will reveal what happened.  Expect to find one ribbon- usually the one on the right (next to the large gears), and its break approximately 1 &#8211; 3mm from its stitched end.  Sometimes two ribbons break.  Same place too.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9509.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>In this camera, the two ribbons snapped.  The original material used by the factory &#8211; <em>&#8220;Арсенал&#8221;</em> in the Ukraine- was woven acetate. The two main concerns in ribbon replacement are, 1- the mechanical aspects of repair; and 2- getting the suitable material to replace the broken ribbons.  The latter involves using substitutes such as tailoring or ornamental ribbons, or camera straps from camera repair suppliers.  Many people have reported success with ordinary acetate ribbons.  However, getting one in the right width (3mm) and thickness is not easy.  The wrong size- such as being slightly over 3mm or thicker than what the shutter eyelets can let pass &#8211; can result in shutter failure.</p>
<p>The repair can be done without removing anything more than the shutter cover/film gate.  This camera was taken apart more extensively to allow other repairs like Rangefinder calibration.  In Kiev and Contax, the <strong>entire</strong> shutter assembly <strong><em>has to be removed</em></strong> for simple rangefinder adjustments like vertical or horizontal/infinity alignment.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9510.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>Closer examination shows that the Ribbons in this shutter failed because of age and wear.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9520.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>Note and memorise the positions of the original ribbons- where they were attached, and how.  Measure the distance between the folded ends attached to the spring loaded roller at the bottom and the upper shutter blind.  With broken ribbons, this might not be possible.   This is about 11 cms long.</p>
<p>The ribbon material chosen for this repair is a Japanese made material sourced from a camera repair supplier.  It is made of <strong>real habutae silk.</strong> Not acetate or rayon since the fibres don&#8217;t melt and fuse when put to a flame.  It is exactly 3mm wide, just what Kiev or Contax needs.  Real silk is smooth and strong, so it has the strength needed to withstand the shutter&#8217;s strain for some years. Silk is one of the strongest natural fibres.  It&#8217;s thinner though, but the eyelets on the shutter blinds which ride on the ribbons can be crimped a bit for the grip.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9507.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>I have read somewhere that the ribbons used by Zeiss for the Contax was made in Japan.  This was before WWII.  The ribbon shown in the picture is described to be suitable for Contax shutters too.  So I added one to the other and tried to see if the ribbon would work. It did.  In my initial test, I actually fired the shutter 200 times.  At around 800, there was no frilling or any signs of deterioration, even when observed at 5X magnification.  Rick Oleson suggested  to me to test a possible material for suitability by firing (the shutter it&#8217;s on) at least a hundred times.  This one went through 800 cycles without showing any changes.  Two years later, the Kiev I put it in still works.</p>
<p>(<em>I also used a locally sourced acetate ribbon for some of the Kiev shutters.  This also worked.  But it&#8217;s harder to insert it into the numerous shutter parts it has to snake through.  I&#8217;m also down to my last 2 metres and I can no longer find the same thing in the tailoring suppliers</em>.)</p>
<p>Cut the ribbon to suitable length.   11 cm is the distance between the shutter blind and the roller, and a bit of extra length is needed for the folded ends.   I cut a small strip of card to serve as the measuring template.  This makes the cutting of this precious material efficient with minimal or no loss.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9525.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>After cutting, the 10,8 span is marked.  Folds are made on these positions.</div>
<div>The ends of the ribbon strips should be treated with a dopey material like nailpolish or cyanoacrylate glue to seal the ends and make them stiffer for insertion.  The end which will be used for insertion should be tapered a bit.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9526.jpg" alt="" /></div>
</div>
</div>
<p>Once the dope sets, trim to taper one end.  Then bend on the marks.  The folds should be 10.8 &#8211; 11 cms apart.  The folds will hook on the roller and the spring blinds at their respective ends.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9536.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>Insert the ribbons through the rollers, then through the eyelets of the lower shutter blind, and pull out end for attachment to the upper shutter blind.  Make sure that both ribbons have the same length between the roller and the upper shutter blind.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9538.jpg" alt="" /></div>
</div>
<div>The ribbons need to be glued, and then sewn to keep them in place. Use a figure-8 stitch for all four ends.</div>
<div>Turn the lower roller to reel in the lower shutter curtain and the newly attached ribbons.  The ribbons will wrap around the lower shutter blind.  Use the tensioning screw to turn the lower roller.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9539.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>Once reeled in, begin tensioning the shutter.  Tensioning is going to be very very fiddly.  The location of the tensioning screw, its size, and the procedure needed can be taxing to your patience and sanity.   On top of that, the camera must be on its side, where there is nothing to keep it in that position.   The tensioning screw is held in place by a locking plate, which in turn is locked by a smaller setscrew.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9518.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>Once you are able to pass through the hurdle of tensioning the shutter spring properly, you should be able to cock and fire the shutter.   There are actually a lot of parts involved- such as the synch switch actuating lever found on the lower left side (this can detain the lower shutter blind from going up), the catches and the long spring on the lower blind, the curtain separating ramps on the upper part of the film gate, and the large retaining hook on top.</p>
<p>The ribbon should look tight and should pull the lower curtain evenly.  The lower curtain shouldn&#8217;t just fall down when the shutter is fired. Instead it should glide on the ribbon downwards.  If it falls too quickly, the eyelets which hold on the ribbons are too loose and need to be crimped a bit.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/MG_9540.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>There is actually more work involved in making the Kiev shutter work properly after the new ribbons are installed.  A lot of procedures in disassembly and reassembly, as well as accessing camera parts have been omitted here.  Such are not discussed in this article.  Refer to the links given above for more information.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zorkikat.com/kiev-shutter-straps/330/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wanna See What&#8217;s Inside a Canon P?</title>
		<link>http://www.zorkikat.com/wanna-see-whats-inside-a-canon-p/271/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zorkikat.com/wanna-see-whats-inside-a-canon-p/271/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Repair & Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon P rangefinder camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon Rangefinder Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shutter Adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutter Repair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorkikat.com/wanna-see-whats-inside-a-canon-p/271/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This camera was sent to me for repair.&#160; The second(closing) blind of the shutter wasn&#8217;t closing anymore.&#160; 

&#160;
I suspected broken ribbons.&#160; It could however be something else, so the camera had to be stripped to see what really happened..&#160; Getting the Canon P out of its shell was surprisingly easy  

Removing the four main [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This camera was sent to me for repair.&nbsp; The second(closing) blind of the shutter wasn&#8217;t closing anymore.&nbsp; </p>
<div align="center"><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_fuve4vGA1A4/SvGL7LjsgdI/AAAAAAAAARk/4g2EK_t71G0/%5BUNSET%5D.jpg?imgmax=800" /></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I suspected broken ribbons.&nbsp; It could however be something else, so the camera had to be stripped to see what really happened..&nbsp; Getting the Canon P out of its shell was surprisingly easy <img src='http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div align="center"><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_fuve4vGA1A4/SvGMoSe-QpI/AAAAAAAAARo/FjcuK9pe7DI/%5BUNSET%5D.jpg?imgmax=800" /></div>
<p>Removing the four main screws on the outer shell, the selftimer lever assembly, the lens mount, and a couple more screws under it, will take the shell off.</p>
<div align="center"><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_fuve4vGA1A4/SvGNEl3KTUI/AAAAAAAAARs/tF4s5Pnk9Yc/%5BUNSET%5D.jpg?imgmax=800" /></div>
<p>One of the ribbons which pulled the second blind home had snapped. </p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v93/zorkikat/SNB15227.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></div>
<p>Titanium foil was used by Canon for their model &#8220;P&#8221; and &#8220;7&#8243; RFs, in place of the usual rubber-coated cloth.&nbsp; The titanium foil can wrinkle from fatigue.&nbsp; Or in this case, stress from being stuck and then being pulled out to be mended.</p>
<p>The top of the camera is very complicated.&nbsp; This scary looking part has the shutter speed controls, the wind/rewind clutch, frame counter, shutter release, and film advance/transport.</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v93/zorkikat/SNB15237.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></div>
<p>And this is the part which gives the floating framelines.&nbsp; It&#8217;s semi-silvered inside.</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v93/zorkikat/SNB15240.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></div>
<p>The broken ribbon was replaced with a new one.&nbsp; The intact upper ribbon was unglued so that a new one can be patterned after it.&nbsp; The shutter was no longer disassembled.&nbsp; The ribbons were threaded through the rollers, attached to the lath, and the other end reglued to the outer roller. Stitched in red:</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v93/zorkikat/SNB15245.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></div>
<p>Under the camera is the complicated Canon RF flash sync circuit.&nbsp; Disassembly not recommended!</p>
<div align="center"><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_fuve4vGA1A4/SvGNvQ6jH7I/AAAAAAAAARw/Pa4o6Haxxok/%5BUNSET%5D.jpg?imgmax=800" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zorkikat.com/wanna-see-whats-inside-a-canon-p/271/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industar-69 28mm</title>
		<link>http://www.zorkikat.com/industar-69-28mm/265/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zorkikat.com/industar-69-28mm/265/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rangefinder and Focus Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian and Ukrainian Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Using Leicas and Leica Clones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens modification and adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epson r-d1s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industar-69]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorkikat.com/industar-69-28mm/265/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This lens was made for the half-frame Belarussian &#8220;Chaika&#8221; (&#8221;Чайка&#8221; = &#8220;Seagull&#8221;) half-frame cameras.  The 2nd and 3rd models of the Chaika were designed to have removable lenses.  No one is sure why this was done -the first Chaika model had a fixed, non-detachable lens-, but I think it was to allow the lens to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lens was made for the half-frame Belarussian &#8220;Chaika&#8221; (&#8221;Чайка&#8221; = &#8220;Seagull&#8221;) half-frame cameras.  The 2nd and 3rd models of the Chaika were designed to have removable lenses.  No one is sure why this was done -the first Chaika model had a fixed, non-detachable lens-, but I think it was to allow the lens to be used in an Enlarger for printing.</p>
<p>The lens has the standard Leica M39 thread (LTM39) mount,  but the working distance (the focal plane to lens mount flange distance the lens is positioned which allows infinity focus) is not the the same.  Leica&#8217;s is 28,8mm.  Chaika used something like 29 or so mm.  This extra millimetre or so prevents infinity focusing when the I-69 28mm lens is mounted on the Leica.</p>
<div><em><br />
</em></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_fuve4vGA1A4/SumlO7ZSifI/AAAAAAAAARc/fGYv98H0jUw/%5BUNSET%5D.jpg?imgmax=800" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>the &#8220;Индустар-69&#8243; 2,8/28mm mounted on a Leica IIIc</em></p>
<p>As the reader will note later, infinity focus is not the only, nor is it the greatest concern here.  Coverage, or the ability to focus an image large enough to fill the frame.  &#8220;Frame&#8221; here is relative- the standard 24 X 36mm, &#8216;half-frame&#8217;(a.k.a. &#8220;single frame&#8221;) 18 X 24mm, and the 23.7 x 15.6 mm APS-C size  			CCD of the Epson whose 1,5X factor makes it &#8217;see&#8217; like a 42mm on standard 35.</p>
<p>The lens was modified by altering its focus movement.  Portions of the inner barrel were filed away to make the lens move further in to allow infinity focus.  The focusing scale on the barrel was also reset to synchronise it with the lens&#8217; focus.  The aperture mark no longer coincided at the new positions, so a new mark was made by putting a drop of red paint on the aperture adjusting ring.</p>
<p>The lens too, being originally meant for a non-RF coupled camera, will focus only by scale since it has no means of engaging with the RF cams of the camera.  Scale focusing with a 28mm isn&#8217;t that hard- its greater DOF more than compensates for focusing errors.  Plus, the I-69 has three &#8220;snapshot&#8221; focus settings on its barrel: &#8220;Portrait&#8221;, &#8220;Group&#8221;, and Landscape&#8221;.  How is this used?  Look through the finder and set the focus against the figure which resembles closest what was seen through the finder:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_fuve4vGA1A4/SumulQSu5wI/AAAAAAAAARg/gsjSWO-URtU/%5BUNSET%5D.jpg?imgmax=800" alt="" /></p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em>Just line up the figure against the pink triangle which corresponds to &#8220;how much&#8221; is seen in the viewfinder.</em></p>
<div style="text-align: left;">Focusing is often a trivial matter.  In many instances, leaving the scale at the &#8220;group shot&#8221; mark (the 3 metre mark) and using f/8 will deliver DOF with a range of 1,6 metres to infinity.</p>
<p>Since the I-69 was designed to cover the 18X24 frame, the IMAGE CIRCLE it produces will be much smaller- smaller than what &#8216;full frame&#8217; needs, but sufficient for the smaller &#8216;half-frame&#8217;.</p>
<p>On an APS frame, the corners already vignette.  Aside from losing coverage, the edges of the image circle also dims.  Here is what it does with the Epson R-D1s digital rangefinder camera:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/EPS4881.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Scale-focused/distance &#8216;guess-timated&#8217; at 0,9 metre.  Full 2,8 aperture.<br />
The I-69 is a Tessar type lens, and produces a swirly blur when used at full aperture, for closeups.<br />
The corners of the picture show significant vignetting.</em></p>
<div>If the smaller APS-C frame already shows vignetting, a full 35mm frame shows TOTAL DARKENING at the corners of the frame.  This, as well as the significant loss of definition at the threshold areas indicate that its image circle is too small for the 35mm format, but more than sufficient for the half-frame picture.</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/2009-10-29_54.jpg" alt="" /></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Same subject as above, but on a 24X36mm Leica frame.<br />
The blue tinge stems from the unfiltered exposure of tungsten movie film in daylight.</em></p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><img class="aligncenter" style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/2009-10-29_28.jpg" alt="" /></em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><img class="aligncenter" style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/2009-10-29_36.jpg" alt="" /></em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<div><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The significant vignetting prevents further use of the lens for &#8217;serious&#8217; work on full frame 35.  However, it can be useful for experimental or whimsical applications.</p>
<p>On the Epson R-D1s, it can be used as a scale-focus snapshot lens, with a 42mm view.  Using it at f/8, the vignetting is not to apparent in many situations.</p>
<p>The lens would be a perfect &#8220;normal&#8221; focal length for the micro 4/3s cameras.  No modification is even necessary to adjust the focus.<br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em><br />
<em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em><br />
<em><br />
</em></div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zorkikat.com/industar-69-28mm/265/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Newest FED-1</title>
		<link>http://www.zorkikat.com/my-newest-fed-1/255/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zorkikat.com/my-newest-fed-1/255/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Repair & Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leica Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian and Ukrainian Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shutter Adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorkikat.com/my-newest-fed-1/255/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Latest FED camera.  Not like my other FED.  And not quite what many would like.

It cost about the same, perhaps even more, than the usual, working similar FED model from a later time.  At that cost, those FED even come with a lens.  This one doesn&#8217;t even have its lens mount.  Missing just about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>My Latest FED camera.  Not like my other FED.  And not quite what many would like.</strong></p>
<p><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MG_61151.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>It cost about the same, perhaps even more, than the usual, working similar FED model from a later time.  At that cost, those FED even come with a lens.  This one doesn&#8217;t even have its lens mount.  Missing just about every exterior fastening screw, and without its pressure plate and pressure plate springs.</p>
<p>This FED has a 5-digit serial number which puts its production year to 1937.  Marked NKVD (НКВД), &#8220;Peoples Commissariat for Internal Affairs&#8221; the KGB&#8217;s predecessor in Stalin&#8217;s time.  This does not mean that the camera was  made for the Secret Police.  It only meant that the camera was made by a factory which was managed by the NKVD.  &#8220;FED&#8221; after all stood for F E Dzerzhinskij, the founder of the NKVD.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MG_61243.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>The shutter crate bottom is bent and distorted.  The crate isn&#8217;t a single cast part, like in later cameras.  In this one, it&#8217;s made of several stamped plates joined together.  The crate looks to have been hand stamped and assembled.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MG_61221.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>At least the parts involved in the shutter and range-finding operations seem to be complete.  Dirty, but intact.  No broken gear teeth.  Gear trains still meshed.</p>
<p>And despite its damage, the viewfinder is very bright and contrasty.  The rangefinder window is also clear, with a very clear patch showing a snappy moving image.  Better than what I&#8217;ve seen in better graded old Leicas!.   The Soviets must have used a different, more corrosion-resistant reflective coating on their RF beam-splitters.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MG_61301.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>The shutter blinds, made of highly perishable cloth and rubber are totally gone.  The fabric tapes which pulled the blinds to and fro appear to still be doing their work.  In fact the long tapes ( looped on brown coloured brass roller on the right) can be seen still tight, reeling in what remains of the long shutter blind.    The shutter blinds and tapes (ribbons) can be easily replaced.</p>
<p>The Rangefinder Coupling &#8220;sensor&#8221; (the silver coloured part at the top part of the shutter crate) is oblong shaped, not the small tear-dropped shape found in later FED-1 cameras.  Some references say that cameras of this type should have the tear drop-shaped focus follower.  This one still has the oblong version of the first type.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MG_61271.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>Somewhere on the shutter crate (in the part next to the film cassette) is engraved &#8220;II/11/XII&#8221; and &#8220;5.42&#8243;.  Both sets of figures appear to correspond to date marks.  &#8220;5.42&#8243;, i.e, May 1942 may refer to a later servicing date since the camera&#8217;s serial number dates it from 1937.  Russian date notations use a mixture of hindu-arabic and roman numerals:  roman for months and hindu-arabic for month and year.  The usual order is day-month-year; so 28 October 2009 would be inscribed as &#8220;28/X/09&#8243;.  &#8220;II/11/XII does not seem to refer to a proper date.  Is &#8220;II&#8221; the second year of manufacture?  11/XII may refer to December 11.  But again, the serial number of this camera, starting with &#8220;31&#8243; puts it at an earlier date in 1937 since the number range covered by that year goes to &#8220;53xxx&#8221;.</p>
<p>Restoration will be done soon.  The works can be cleaned, and the shutter blinds replaced and new fastening screws attached.  However, this FED won&#8217;t be functional until it gets a pressure plate and a lens mount.   Something with a standard Leica flange would be great to have, and have this camera calibrated to the correct Leica Standard.   This FED originally had a non-standard lens mount and lens working distance.  Only the original lens which the factory issued with the camera would properly work.   Having neither lens or lens mount means more flexibility in restoring this camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zorkikat.com/my-newest-fed-1/255/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ancient Wooden Field View Camera Restoration</title>
		<link>http://www.zorkikat.com/ancient-wooden-field-view-camera-restoration/229/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zorkikat.com/ancient-wooden-field-view-camera-restoration/229/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Repair & Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view camera/ large format category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bellows repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY bellows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large format photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view camera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorkikat.com/ancient-wooden-field-view-camera-restoration/229/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
For all its apparent simplicity in construction, repairing an old wooden view camera can be as difficult,  if not more difficult, than fixing a Leica.  These old wood and leather and brass cameras have more in common with cabinets and furniture than with gears and springs found in the mechanical average metal and plastic cameras.   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/IGP0386.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>For all its apparent simplicity in construction, repairing an old wooden view camera can be as difficult,  if not more difficult, than fixing a Leica.  These old wood and leather and brass cameras have more in common with cabinets and furniture than with gears and springs found in the mechanical average metal and plastic cameras.   Less precision in operation, but more demanding in fitting.  Everything is handmade and cut to fit.    The old screws don&#8217;t unscrew anymore.  Brass and wood tend to fuse somehow after decades (this camera must be anywhere from 60-100 years old).  The old screws have to be replaced with new ones with bigger threads to fasten the parts together.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/IGP0398.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>The bellows in this camera has collapsed.  It was in a much better state when it arrived, but age has taken its toll- the mere action of folding and unfolding has caused the bellows to fall apart.  Add to that a sneaky fat cat who mistook the extended camera as a &#8220;pet taxi&#8221; and decided to sleep in it&#8230;    The bellows is actually a composite of three materials: An inner liner of black cloth,  glue-soaked cardboard stiffeners (those brown strips seen above), and an outer skin of synthetic leatherette.  Considering what went in, there would actually be 5 layers- leatherette, glue, cardboard, glue, and blacking varnish.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/IGP0404.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>The materials for making new bellows can be easily found.  Bristol board (&#8221;cartolina&#8221;), glue, black cotton twill (thinner grade), and red bookbinding cloth, and black flat latex paint.  I chose red instead of black because I thought it would look nicer with the old wood than black.   The bookbinding cloth is rather expensive, so it&#8217;s best to do a &#8220;dummy&#8221; bellows first using a cheaper material.</p>
<p>Bookbinding cloth is painted black first (using black latex paint).  2 layers should suffice.  Absolute light proofing isn&#8217;t necessary here, just enough to make the  bookbinding cloth totally black on the inner side.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/IGP0413.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>Lay over the old bellows over the new, to get the needed dimensions.  Leave plenty of allowances on all sides.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_4993.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>Measure the folds and width (narrow and long ends) of the bellows.  Note the size of the angled side folds too.  Use these measurements to determine the specifications for the cardboard stiffeners.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_4997.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>Make four panels, and number them.  Then draw lines across where the fold will be.  For tapered bellows, it seems that the folds aren&#8217;t equal in width, but instead alternate from wide to narrow.  The difference isn&#8217;t much- in this bellows, the wide pleat was just 2 mm wider than the narrow one.   Panels 1 and 3 will have the same frequency in the narrow/wide alternate pattern.  Panels 2 and 4 will be similar.  So if 1 and 3 starts with wide-narrow-wide-narrow pattern, 2 and 4 will be narrow-wide-narrow-wide.</p>
<p>And instead of having pointy ends with separate strips, this variation is adapted from the bellows style used in small roll film folding cameras:  straight strips narrower than the full bellows width.  The angle folds on the side will no longer have stiffeners in them.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5005.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>Cutting on the lines.  Instead of cutting the panel into separate strips, the cuts were made so that a bit of paper remained uncut on both sides to keep the panel in one piece.  Glueing separate little strips can be difficult.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5008.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>The cuts made the paper board &#8216;limp&#8217; to allow easy folding to form the bellows&#8217;s &#8220;hills and valleys&#8221;.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5011.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>Lay the panels on the bookbinding cloth and trace their positions with white pencil.  Leave space between each panel.  The size of this space is based on the width of the angled folds of the original bellows.  The original spacing was about 2,5 cm, but for this bellows, it was set to 1,6cm instead, because of the changes in the actual material and specifications used.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_50211.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>The panels are pasted on the book binding cloth.  Instead of glue, traditional <a href="http://www.rumela.com/recipe/cont_bookbinder%27s_paste.htm">&#8220;bookbinding paste&#8221; </a>was used instead.  Since the materials involved were the same used for book binding, why not use the proper adhesive as well?  This process will require lots of adhesive, and a litre of PVA glue can be very expensive.   Apply the paste generously on the surfaces marked with the white lines.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5024.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>Lay the panels on the pasted bookbinding cloth.  One thing good about using bookbinder&#8217;s paste is that it&#8217;s not as tacky as PVA glue and sets very slowly.  You can reposition the panels.  If the panels get soggy, that&#8217;s good.  It means that the paste in getting in them and will stiffen them further when it dries.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5026.JPG" alt="" /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>Flatten the panels well, make sure that they are in absolute contact with the book binding cloth.  No lifting should be allowed.  Leave for about half an hour to let some of the water in the paste evaporate.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5032.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>Apply paste on the panels, and in the spaces in between and beyond them.  Make sure that it&#8217;s totally covered so that the cloth liner will totally adhere on the bellows skin.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5031.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>Lay a piece of black twill cloth on the pasted surface.  Stretch it flat over, until it adheres fully.  Leave the composite bellows skin stretched on a flat surface.  Allow it to dry and set.  The bad thing about bookbinder&#8217;s paste is that it takes about a day or two to fully set, longer in humid weather.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5036.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>After cutting the bellows to size (make sure there is a bit of flap, about 5 cm wide left adjacent to panel 1 or 4 to allow an overlap), glue to close the seam.    The cardboard stiffener&#8217;s cuts will show through the skin and will be used as reference for folding the bellows.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5042.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<div>After the folding.  Start from the wide side, and fold down, alternating hills and valleys between panels.  Make sure that the angled corners are evenly folded.</p>
<div><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.zorkikat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/MG_5060.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>FITTING THE BELLOWS ON THE CAMERA.  Not quite complete yet, but almost there&#8230;</strong></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zorkikat.com/ancient-wooden-field-view-camera-restoration/229/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
